No products in the cart.

Contacts

Opposite Orange Building, Akwa, Douala.

info@slaefoundation.org

+237 676 000 000

CHARITYDONATIONFOOD AND WATERKIDS IN AFRICA

How African Students Can Solve African Problems

How African Students Can Solve African Problems

CHARITYDONATIONFOOD AND WATERKIDS IN AFRICA

Volunteer Programs For Orphanage In Africa

Volunteer Programs For Orphanage In Africa

African orphanage volunteer programs are designed specifically to help the less fortunate people of sub-Saharan Africa. There are many organizations and volunteers in this sector that operate within the limits of Africa. A number of them work in coordination with international agencies, while others function independently. Most of them operate in tandem with the well-known Catholic Church in an effort to provide spiritual support to the underprivileged in the society. There are also others who are actively involved in providing care and assistance to orphans in different countries of Africa. Sponsor a child in africa today with the help of Save Lives Foundation. Donate money to charity to help fight agaist child abuse.

The Best Charities to Donate to in the Africa

The need for African orphanage volunteer work is becoming more urgent as time goes by since the population is continuously growing. With a critical shortage of skilled workers, many children are left to fend for themselves. In order to prevent the situations from getting much worse, African countries have been working hard on putting up plans and strategies for helping these children and bringing about a massive increase in the voluntary contribution from individuals who want to participate in the volunteering programs. how much should i donate to charity

How to fight against workdwide child abuse.

This explains why there is a booming industry of African orphanage volunteering today. Those who want to take part in the work can choose from any number of projects depending on their interests and capabilities. They can be from any country in the world and include volunteers from Europe, America and Asia as well. In most cases, the orphans that are cared for in these homes are minors since the governments prefer to focus on those who are old enough to be taken care of. Are you looking for a Food donation drop off near me and or where to  donate money to charity, Save live Foundation is the first place you should think of.

Charities percentage of donation that goes to charity

Most volunteer programs for African orphans focus on educating these poor kids. This is one of the most effective ways in which they can be reached and taught to live better lives. However, they are left to fend for themselves once they reach adulthood. For this reason, they need to be provided with more than just a roof over their heads. They need to be provided with food and clothes as well. That is why it is very important for an individual who plans to participate in African volunteer programs to consider raising money to help with the costs of the children’s day-to-day needs. how much should i donate to charity.

Volunteer work abroad free travel and accommodation or donate money to charity

There are many volunteer organizations which specifically aim at helping African orphans. These organizations provide training on how to handle the children and how to provide them with their basic needs and also how to educate them. The benefits of these programs are not limited to the kids themselves but extend to the communities as well. More involvement from the community will certainly mean a more stable society overall. That is something that any philanthropist would want to see. how to protect your children from child abuse: a parent’s guide.

Reeasons to donate money to charity

Of course, there is always the possibility of going beyond just collecting money for the care of the children to actually becoming a part of the lives of these innocent victims. If you are interested in fulfilling this dream then you can start by looking online for African orphanages volunteer work programs in your own area. You will surely be able to find a number of organizations in your immediate vicinity that are willing to take in and train you volunteers. As long as you are willing to put in the effort and have the drive to help these kids you can be sure that you will make a good contribution to humanity.

Uncategorized

Donate Blood Today

Donating to charity has been practiced for thousands of years. It’s an act of giving that can have a significant impact on someone or a cause, as well as help others in need. The act of donating has been associated with charitable giving and good deeds for hundreds of years. It is an increasingly popular form of giving today, and the trend shows no signs of slowing down. How To Donate Blood, is a question many donors are asking daily but do not worry as Sale Foundation is here to help. whare can I donate blood near me

Donating to charity can take various forms, which can include monetary donations, alms, tangible goods, or services like food, toys, clothing, and transportation. A great benefit of donating to charity is the fact that you can do your part to make a difference in the lives of those who need it most. By donating to charity, you can meet many of your basic living needs, which will help those in need tremendously. How To Donate Blood in Cameroon.

There are hundreds of charities out there to choose from, but unfortunately not every charity is as kind or as generous as you might hope. Some people think that donating money to charity is the easiest way to help others, but unfortunately, this isn’t always the case. Charities need funding and need your support to continue operating, so when donating money to charity, keep this in mind. Charities need the money they receive to meet their daily operating costs and programs, and unfortunately cannot function properly without them. The Best Charities to Donate to in Africa

One option that some might consider when donating money to charity is donating plasma to a reputable convalescent center. Plasma works like an IV, so if you donate plasma to a facility that works to treat patients with IV problems, it can be used to help others in need. These convalescent centers are similar to hospice facilities, as they often work to help those who are terminally ill before they become deceased. They often treat patients for up to a year before they are able to make a final decision about their care. By donating plasma to these facilities, you could potentially help a person whose life is so fragile that they would otherwise never even know they had the possibility to end their life.

Donating platelets to a reputable platelet company is another great option for donating money to charity. You don’t have to do much with your time or money when donating platelets to someone who will use them to help others through a great charity program. This program works by collecting platelets from people who don’t have enough platelets. The platelets are then broken down and refined, mixed with other components, and sent to different blood banks where they will be stored until needed. This is one of the most direct and effective ways for you to be part of helping others in need through a charitable organization, and by donating your platelets you can be sure that your efforts will be greatly appreciated. how much should I donate to charity?

Why We Should Donate Blood Today.

There are several options for those who want to make a difference when donating to charity. One option is to visit a blood bank and see if your platelet donations are accepted. Another option is to visit a website that has already compiled a list of blood banks and their requirements. Donating with the help of a third party can be a great option, allowing you to take advantage of professional services while getting the help you need without having to spend too much time researching what options are available to you. By donating your platelets to a blood banking organization, you can give those who need it the chance to get the medical help that they need and you can help spread the word about a great cause that you believe in. Donate money to charity today to help buy blood.

A charitable donation is a legal obligation to give to a charity, relief organization, or for an individual’s or group’s social welfare. A donated item does not have a special property or ownership status. A charitable donation can take different forms, such as cash, alms, goods, or services like clothing, toys, etc. A charitable donation can also meet limited medical needs like blood and organs for transplants. hospital volunteer opportunities near me

Donating requires some time and careful consideration. It is a life-long process of searching for the right charity for a donor’s chosen cause and type of donation. It requires financial planning, budgeting, determining what percentage of your income will go to the chosen charity, and of course, putting in time and effort. For those who are unable to give personally, there are other ways of making a donation through a charitable organization or institution. Donating online, through wills, trusts, and other legal procedures are just a few of the options available for donors.

Donations through charitable organizations should be made according to the instructions on the donation form. Donors must ensure that the charity accepts all forms of credit cards, including PayPal. Certain types of charities require specific methods of contribution, such as by check, direct deposit, and using the charity’s e-check program. Donations through these channels take some time depending on the transfer and processing of the funds. You should also look into the policies and procedures of the particular charity. This ensures that your donation will be categorized properly.

There are a number of benefits to donating through a fundraising event, including donor recognition, donor incentive programs, and more. Charitable fundraising events include a variety of activities, like raffles, games, silent auctions, and more. You can always visit a website of your choice and learn more about donating through a fundraiser, caller ID option, and more. If you have questions, you can call your favorite charity and talk with a representative.

One of the main issues in contributing to a charitable organization is the process of donor notification. Depending on your choice and organization, this process varies. It may be best to contact the charity and discuss the process in detail. The main concern is ensuring the safe and timely collection and processing of gifts-in-kind. Remember, not all charities accept gifts-in-kind. How To Donate Blood. how to help homeless people.

Donating blood is an important way of donating to help those in need. By donating blood, you can help save lives. Donating blood pressure equipment is another great way to help and improve the lives of those who are in need. Contact your local blood pressure center to learn more about donating blood pressure equipment. Whether you donate blood, plasma, or platelets, you can make a difference in the lives of others. how much should i donate to charity.

Uncategorized

Donate To Charity Today

Donate To Charity Today- Why Does It Make Sense?

Have you ever been asked to donate to charity? This is something that many people have probably done at some point. There are always different ways to donate to charity, but a lot of times when someone wants to give to charity they end up thinking about getting money out of their pocket. While that is fine, and a very important aspect of donating to charity, the other side of donating to charity is also very important. The other side of donating to charity is the fact that you are giving something to someone who needs it. When you donate to charity to your giving helps out that person and their needs.

While at times there may be questions as to where the money goes for the public, the truth is, everybody in it is looking to do something a bit bigger than what one can do by themselves. The truth is this: when you donate to charity, you’re actually doing a better thing in the world at large. Feeling good about yourself is really important. If you feel good about yourself, then you are much more likely to help others, especially when you are donating to charity. Donating to charity will help out organizations that are in need of help.

When you donate to charity, you have the option to take a charitable deduction. A charitable deduction is a deduction that you can take in order to put more money back in your pocket. This is a great way to keep more of your hard-earned money in your own pocket – it gives you a nice tax break.

Charitable donations are not only given to help out with the different types of charitable organizations. There are many other reasons why people give away money to charities. The most common reason given is that the money raised will be used for the charity’s intended purpose. There are also times when donating to charity is given to raise funds for an actual illness or for other medical needs.

Donating to charities is really a great way to show your support for the different types of organizations out there. When you donate to charity, you are showing not only your support but your generosity as well. By donating to these types of organizations, you are helping to support not only the people but the organizations as well. When you give to charities, you are saying that you not only care about the people and the causes, but you also care about the cause as well.

It makes sense to donate to charity if you are at a low-income level. By doing so, not only are you showing your support, but you are also increasing your ability to earn more in the future. Donating to charities is a great way to increase your resources. This increases your ability to not only care about the causes but also care about the people who work for these causes.

Every year, thousands of individuals give their time and/or cash to various non-profit organizations dedicated to helping others. Here are five great reasons to donate to charity: 1. To help others in need. One of the key elements to living a meaningful and fulfilled life is helping those in need, and by donating to charity, you help this important cause and purpose become a reality for more people.

The United States contributes less than 10 percent of the world’s developed countries’ Gross National Product, according to the World Bank. Because the United States is a relatively poor country overall, and the percentage of its gross national product going to the developing countries is among the lowest in the world, this statistic is particularly important to the US citizens. By contributing a portion of your income, you help alleviate poverty and hunger and can even have an immediate impact on the lives of others. Donating to charity has also been shown to reduce stress and anxiety.

Benefit Of Donating to a Charity Organisation for a Particular Curse.

In most cases, when you make a large donation to a charity you will be sending a check, rather than sending it in a form of a money order or through some other method. This is because most non-profit groups are not able to accept credit cards as payment for donations. Unfortunately, many people do not realize that there is tax-refund money available to them if they donate tax-refundable money, such as when you donate cash or a check to a charity.

Donating to charity is also a great way to claim a tax deduction. When you file your income tax return, you will be able to claim a tax deduction for any amount you donate to charity. There are specific tax benefits for the charitable contributions of money or property.

Charities that receive major assistance from the government, such as the Department of Health and Human Services, or the Federal Trade Commission, are also eligible for tax deductions. These types of organizations are known as non-profit charitable organizations. When you donate to charity, you can claim a tax deduction that will offset the amount you donated. The two most common forms of tax deductions are self-employed expenses and charitable donations.

There are many reasons to donate to charities. Not only can you be making a difference in someone’s life, but when you donate to charities there is a chance for a better place to live. By donating to charities, you can help relieve poverty and hunger and provide education for those who need it most. Donating to charities is a simple thing that can really make a difference.

CHARITYDONATIONFOOD AND WATERKIDS IN AFRICA

Several Different Types Of Charity Organizations

There are a lot of different kinds of charities. Many different kinds of charities have different ways of doing things, with different long-term goals in mind. However, some kinds of charities are almost identical in that they are both charitable organizations and they both aim to help people in their situations. A charitable organization is usually an international organization whose main goals are social good-health and welfare. In Canada, there are many different ones. Some examples include the Canadian Cancer Society, Canadian Alzheimer’s Society, the Canadian Blood Cancer Society, the Canadian HIV Society, and the Canadian School Fundraiser. There are many types of charity organizations which you need to know about. Give a helping hand.

There are a number of charity organizations that focus on providing assistance to people who are facing extraordinary hardships. They work by providing food, shelter, clothing, health care, training, and education to people who are in need. There are also charity organizations that focus on providing basic necessities to those in developing countries. They do this through school supplies, water systems, trash collection, and immunization programs. how to help homeless people. how much should I donate to charity

Charities are rated according to how effective they are at meeting their stated purposes. Charity ratings are usually given on a scale from A to DDD. Each level has a certain number of stars assigned to it. These ratings are used to determine which charities should be studied by the public and which are the most worthy to support.

There are also Charity Organizations that are not categorized according to levels of needs and charitable goals. In the US, for example, there are not just national or state-funded charities, but private non-profit organizations that are mainly run by people. Examples of these non-profits are churches, universities, synagogues, and other similar organizations. Some wealthy people also donate money to non-profits, but they do so for the purposes of gaining publicity, creating an influence in society, and/or other similar reasons. Education development

Charity Organizations also differ in terms of how much they need, how they get the funds, and what types of services or goods they specialize in providing. There are also Charity Organizations that are not run by government authorities or public officials. Examples of these types of charities are social movements, political organizations, and religious organizations. When you donate money to any of these types of Charity Organizations, you are basically helping out someone who needs it in some way. The most important thing to remember when donating to any of these charities is that whatever your reasons for doing so are, you should keep in mind that whatever your monetary assistance reaches will be put to good use. This will help alleviate some of the financial hardships of the charity in the future, allowing them to better serve their communities in the future. economic empowerment for women

Non-profit charities are a valuable asset to help relieve poverty and hunger around the world. Many organizations provide free or low cost products and services to those who cannot otherwise afford to spend money on necessities. Some people donate money to non-profits to try and create change in areas where they feel the government and private sector are not well-suited. Other people donate to non-profits in an effort to help improve their local community. No matter what your reasons are for donating to a charity organization, you are making an excellent and much needed contribution to the world at large.

A charity organization or charity is basically an institution that is organized to enhance the social well-being and humanitarian activities of its donors, beneficiaries, and other beneficiaries. It is also known as a not-for-profit organization that requires an annual budget in the amount of its income from voluntary contributions, revenues, gifts, and public contributions. These types of organizations are mostly established to alleviate poverty, promote economic development, build infrastructure and provide health care. There are various types of charity organizations.

There are some charity organizations that focus on providing specific types of assistance to the needy. These can include providing food and other emergency assistance, clean water and sanitation, basic medical assistance, debt relief, and education among others. There are also organizations that focus on providing assistance in the form of disaster relief. Among these types are: Relieving poverty in developing countries, providing micro and small loans to families in need, providing food assistance and disaster relief, setting up schools and communities to help the victims of natural disasters, Education for the poor, etc.

Charity organizations that focus on the prevention of diseases also exist. Among these are: AIDS organizations, AIDS fundraising and Prevention programs, etc. The need to alleviate the suffering caused by such diseases has led to the rise of many such organizations. There are also several other diseases prevention programs such as smoking cessation, skin hygiene, and dietary counseling, and testing for high levels of cholesterol and blood sugar among others. These charity organizations provide a host of other services to their clients, such as referrals to local authorities in case of need, financial and medical assistance, volunteer opportunities for high school students, etc.

Another type of charity organization exists that focuses on providing medical care to people suffering from serious health problems. Some examples of such organizations are Christian charities, Hindu charities, Jewish charities, etc. They provide medical care at a low cost or free of cost, focusing on treating the most common illnesses and diseases, and also offer financial aid to families or individuals who cannot afford to pay for medical treatment. There are many other types of non-profit organizations that provide medical care to the poor, and they include schools, orphanages, women’s organizations, and so on. how to protect your children from child abuse: a parent’s guide

National and local government organizations often support charity organizations to continue their work in the community. The support could be in the form of monetary or non-monetary support. For example, national organizations that focus on AIDS can receive funds from the national government through the Red Cross, and local ones through the government’s economic assistance programs. National organizations focusing on Parkinson’s research receive funds from the Parkinson Foundation and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS). charities percentage of donation that goes to charity

There are also many other types of charity organizations. Among them are food banks, food pantries, daycare centers, shelters for abused or neglected animals, women’s organizations, AIDS/HIV organizations, environmental non-profit organizations, and so on. These provide free or low-cost assistance programs to the needy. These programs may be short-term, long-term, specific in scope, or focused on a particular need.

Uncategorized

Humanitarian led community-based surveillance: a case study in Ekondo-Titi, Cameroon | orphanages near me

Background

Community-based surveillance (CBS) has been used successfully in many situations to strengthen existing health systems as well as in humanitarian crises. The Anglophone crisis of Northwest Southwest Cameroon, led to burning of villages, targeting of health personnel and destruction of health facilities which, in combination with distrust for the government services led to a collapse of surveillance for outbreak prone diseases.

Methods

We evaluated the ability of the CBS system to identify suspected cases of outbreak prone diseases (OPD) as compared to the facility-based surveillance, evaluated the timeliness of the CBS system in identifying an OPD, reporting of OPD to District Health Service (DHS) and timeliness in outbreak response. The paper also assessed the collaboration with the DHS and contribution of the CBS system with regards to strengthening the overall surveillance of the health district and also determine the interventions undertaken to contain suspected/confirmed outbreaks.

Results

In total 9 alerts of suspected OPDs were generated by the CBS system as compared to 0 by the DHS, with 8 investigated, 5 responses and 3 confirmed outbreaks. Average time from first symptoms to alert generation by the CBS system was 7.3 days. Average time lag from alert generation from the CBS to the DHS was 0.3 days which was essentially within 24 h. There was extensive and synergistic collaboration with the DHS.

Discussion

CBS generated a higher number of alerts than traditional outbreak reported used in the region, and had timely investigations and if appropriate, responses. Careful selection of CHWs with strong community engagement led to the success of the project, and the use of the mobile health team in situ allowed for rapid responses to potential outbreaks, as well as for feedback to CHWs and communities. CBS was also well utilized for identification of other events, such as displacement and malnutrition.

Conclusion

In conflict settings, CBS can help in outbreak identification as well as other events, and a mobile health team is crucial to the success of the CBS due to the ability to rapidly response to generated alerts. The mobile health team provided timely investigation of 8 of 9 alerts generated. Collaboration with existing DHS structures is important for systems strengthening in such settings.

Background

Community-based surveillance (CBS) is defined as the systematic detection and reporting of events of public health significance by community members within a community. CBS has been used in both; non crisis settings for public health emergencies and crisis situations including conflict and natural disasters. CBS has been used in eradication programs including guinea worm and polio, as well as data for maternal mortality, mortality from infectious diseases and malnutrition. CBS systems have been reported in emergencies around the world, contributing to improving emergency programming in communities. The increasing use of CBS in conflict-affected areas is reshaping humanitarian response in ways by timely reporting of specific information to those who offer assistance.

CBS was developed to overcome logistical difficulties of travel and communication, which are common in low-and-middle-income countries which constrain the conventional surveillance system reliant on epidemiologists visiting sites to discover and investigate cases, particularly in rural areas. CBS can be cost-effective as community members are often willing to report for little financial compensation leading to low costs for information gathering. CBS is recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) for use in displacement camps, complex emergencies, and outbreaks [3], and can function in the pre-epidemic period, during epidemics, and post epidemic period. Despite the benefits of CBS, there are many challenges associated with it, as identified by Ratnayake et al. These included but are not limited to; decreasing acceptability from communities resulting from the weariness of constantly being asked about loss of life, weekly home visits with no direct benefits to households, CHWs experiencing tiredness and threats from community members towards CBS workers. In addition, enumeration of populations is challenging in some settings, especially in areas where due to protection incidents, certain populations do not want to be found.

Conflict and other crisis affected populations face a myriad of humanitarian problems and needs including population displacement, separation of families, food insecurity, absence of health services and increase vulnerability to outbreaks. The destruction of health facilities and the displacement or death of health facility staff members leads to a collapse of the health system, including immunization services and disease surveillance.

There is little evidence available on the use of CBS in conflict-affected communities of Cameroon since the armed crisis dubbed “the Anglophone Crisis” started in the Northwest Southwest (NWSW) regions in 2016. Though a couple of humanitarian organizations might be using it to activate early warnings of outbreaks. It is estimated that more than 200 villages have been destroyed or abandoned due to the conflict. The Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) estimated in December 2019, 679,000 people were internally displaced in NWSW Cameroon. The insecurity, displacement of health professionals and targeted attacks on health facilities have led to the closure of 37% of health centers in the NWSW, a situation which is replicated in Ekondo-Titi health district. Prior to 2016, the district had 13 health facilities and one hospital serving a population of 56,503 inhabitants. By March 2019, the number of functional health facilities had dropped to 4. Surveillance, which relied upon health facility reporting, deteriorated in the health district as it did across NWSW Cameroon. In 2019, 9 health districts in the Southwest did not report a suspected case on measles, neonatal tetanus, yellow fever, or AFP, and within Ekondo-Titi health district no suspected cases were identified in 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018. This is most likely due to reduced surveillance rather than the true lack of outbreaks as there were also no false reports. In addition, community acceptance of government facilities decreased, and it became increasingly difficult for government workers to continue to live or work in these areas, which led to drop-in surveillance due to lack of presence. Prior to the Anglophone Crisis, disease surveillance in the health district followed the national Integrated Disease Surveillance System. It involved the district collecting surveillance data from all health facilities within the district based on patients seen at these facilities which are then sent to the Regional Delegation of Public Health for compilation and forwarding to the National Surveillance Unit. In the absence of health facility workers and functional health facilities, the surveillance system for most districts in NWSW Cameroon collapsed. The attacks on and burning of villages caused people to flee, led to family separation with reports of unaccompanied and separated children.

In the light of these happenings SLAE FOUNDATION, with support from UNICEF implemented a one-year project called “Rapid Response Mechanism (RRM+) for a timely emergency response to displaced communities in hard-to-reach areas” within Ekondo-titi Health district. In a bid to improve the identification and notification of outbreaks and occurrence of diseases under the National Surveillance Program, CBS was included in the project activities. This paper would address some of the challenges identified for CBS at the WHO meeting in 2018, namely accessing the most hard-to-reach places, and challenges around the enumeration of populations [1]. This paper presents an evaluation of the CBS system used in the RRM+ project in improving disease surveillance and health outcomes and strengthening the existing district surveillance in conflict-affected communities. Specifically, this paper seeks to evaluate the ability of the CBS system to identify suspected cases of outbreak prone diseases (OPD) as compared to the District Health Service (DHS) facility-based surveillance, evaluate the timeliness of the CBS system in identifying an OPD, and timeliness in outbreak response were appropriate. The paper will also assess the collaboration with the DHS and contribution of the CBS system with regards to strengthening the overall surveillance of the health district and also determine the interventions undertaken to contain suspected/confirmed outbreaks. We also describe the CBS system approach along with the challenges and results which could be replicated for scale-up.

Methods

The CBS system was set up as part of the RRM+ project in Ekondo-titi and it was operational from July 2019 to April 2020, although the RRM+ project itself started in April 2019. The evaluation was carried out after the end of the project and period was from May 2020 to June 2020.

We explain below how we assessed each objective in this paper;

We evaluated the ability of the CBS system to pick up suspected cases of OPDs as compared to the DHS facility-based surveillance. This was done first by checking the district’s data base for disease outbreaks reported by the district from January 2016 to July 2019 in order to set the baseline average disease outbreak reports from Ekondo-titi. We checked the DHS reports on any suspected OPD cases notified in the period July 2019 to April 2020 and RRM+ project reports. Suspected cases of OPD first reported to the DHS by the CBS system mobile health team (MHT) were credited to the CBS system and those first reported from health facilities to the district were credited to the DHS facility-based surveillance.

We evaluated the timeliness of the CBS system. We assessed how soon the CBS system picked up the suspected cases. This was assessed by evaluating outbreak notification, patient history, and field mission reports from the MHT. The patient history contained information on the date the patient or parent reported the first symptoms. For all the reported outbreaks the MHT was able to record the date first symptoms started and where these dates of first symptom could not be identified, the date the parents first noticed physical changes like rashes was considered. From these documents, date of first symptom were extracted and placed against time of identification by CHW who reported the suspected outbreak. We verified response time after notification. This was extracted from MHT notification and outbreak investigation mission reports. Verification response time was the time lag between when the suspected outbreak was reported to the MHT to when the report was investigated and samples collected.

We evaluated the collaboration with the DHS and assess the contribution of the CBS system with regards to strengthening the overall surveillance of the health district. Here we looked at all outbreak alerts picked up by the RRM+ CBS system and checked with the DHS if they were alerted by the MHT and how soon. We also assessed the role of DHS in responding to each report of a suspected or confirmed outbreak.

Finally, we evaluated the interventions undertaken to contain suspected/confirmed outbreaks. This was done by looking at the actions taken by the MHT to contain suspected or confirmed outbreaks by evaluating the field mission reports, weekly, and monthly reports.

Study site

Ekondo-titi health district has a population of 56,503 inhabitants and nine health areas. Three of these health areas Illor, Bamusso and Bekumu are primarily maritime areas, while the other 6 health areas, which include Ekondo titi, Lobe, Bekora, Kumbe Balue, Bafaka Balue, and Bissoro health areas are mainland communities. The RRM+ was implemented in all the above health areas with the exception of Bamusso and Bissoro health areas because these were not affected by the crisis and had functional health facilities.

The goal of the RRM+ project in Ekondo-titi health district was to reduce suffering and improve the coping mechanisms of the affected population. Though the main benefit package was health delivery, the needs of populations in humanitarian settings had to be tackled from a holistic approach. Thus, the project also included nutrition, child protection, and water, sanitation, and hygiene components. These had to be implemented through the use of a MHT made up of a medical doctor, 2 nurses, and a protection officer. The MHT was the first-line response team for any health-related event within the health district. For this to be effective the team needed to set up a CBS system in the health district which could effectively monitor and report health events and cases. The list of diseases that were included for monitoring in the CBS was OPD under surveillance in Cameroon and endemic diseases and other events. These are documented in Table and were selected based on high mortality rates, endemicity, and epidemic potential. Table 1 Outbreak prone diseases under surveillance in Cameroon and endemic diseases and health events monitored in the project

For the RRM+, community health workers (CHWs) were the main field agents at the community level as they were community members who had been internally displaced with the affected populations. The majority of these CHWs (34 of 40) had previously worked in the role as CHWs of the DHS, but 6 were newly recruited in areas where the district had not assigned any trained CHW. These CHWs served as CBS focal persons, following training, and reported to the MHT.

The MHT verified all reports, collected samples where applicable (including stool for cholera or acute flaccid paralysis, whole blood for measles, or swabs for monkeypox or Buruli ulcer), led public health interventions in response to confirmed disease outbreaks, provided feedback to the CHWs and the community. The MHT also informed relevant stakeholders including the DHS and the Regional Delegation of Public Health.

Design of the system

Surveillance of outbreak prone diseases, endemic disease and other events

CBS was intended to complement and bridge the gap in surveillance in areas that routine surveillance was partly or non-functional in the notification of OPD. Surveillance in our project also included monitoring and notification of endemic health issues like malaria, acute respiratory infections (ARI), acute diarrhea, chronic ulcers, and conflict related events like security incidents and population displacements which influence the health of affected populations. The OPD selected were chosen based on their likelihood of occurrence brought about by the conflict and also taking into consideration the associated mortality. For endemic health disease monitoring, it should be noted that the diseases monitored are all disease associated with the greatest under five mortality in Cameroon and conflict settings. Buruli ulcer is endemic in Ekondo-titi and in the context of conflict there is no active surveillance and this could lead to deformities amongst patients who have no access to healthcare. Population displacements were monitored because of the interconnectedness of health, nutritional, water, sanitation, and shelter need and displacement. It was critical to gather this information to prepare for health response in emergency displacements. CHWs were expected to report suspected cases of OPD and other public health events, with OPDs reported immediately, and other endemic or events reported less frequently as OPDs need accurate and timely surveillance and response. For this CBS system a single suspected case of any OPD was sufficient to generate an alert. However, if multiple suspected cases of the same OPD occurred in a single community and reported within the same period, it only counted as one generated alert. The definition of an outbreak is disease specific and is in accordance with the national guidelines. For measle it is four confirmed cases within the same health district within the same time period. For cholera, a single culture confirmed case constitutes an outbreak, similarly for monkeypox.

Suspected cases of measles, cholera, meningitis, neonatal tetanus, AFP were reported immediately through a phone call or text message on the CHWs personal phone, whereas other diseases (diarrhea, malaria and ARI) were reported weekly. The case-fatality rates of the aforementioned diseases necessitated a quick response to control their spread. There was no electronic data collection tool available for CHWS for reporting OPD, due to the extremely poor quality of signal within the district. In some cases, in the absence of network, CHWs walked, sometimes as far as 20 km, to the Reach Out field office to report a case. On receipt of this information by the MHT, and completion of verification, national reporting tools were completed and submitted to the DHS to strengthen local reporting. All data used in the evaluation was collected from RRM+ project outbreak alert reports, field mission reports, weekly and monthly project reports, and DHS reports.

Surveillance on malnutrition was carried out in all selected health areas. CHWs screened every child 6 to 59 months of age during home visits and or any consultation session. They reported number of children screened weekly, number of children 6 to 59 months of age with severe acute malnutrition (SAM), 6 to 59 months with moderate acute malnutrition (MAM). All children with SAM without complication were managed in the community by CHWs under the supervision of the MHT which visited at least once a month to monitor all SAM cases and also provide nutritional counselling to parents and caretakers of children diagnosed with SAM and MAM. All components of the CBS system started simultaneously.

Selection of CHWs

The selection of CHWs was done with the assistance of the DHS and the local leaders of displaced communities. The health district provided a list of CHWs per village as per before the conflict. The MHT then visited each community where local stakeholder engagement meetings were held to confirm the appropriateness of the selected CHW, based on presence in the community and local acceptance. Communities who lacked a CHW due to displacement or lack of local health personnel, identified a member of the community who had good local acceptance for the role. A total of 40 CHWs from 20 communities were identified to be trained in the project. The rational for choosing 40 CHWs was that this was aiming for 1 CHW to cover 500 persons. However, due to poor access to data on displacement as no humanitarians had previously worked in the area, this ended up being quite inaccurate, with some CHWs covering 3 times as many beneficiaries. CHWs had previously been trained in iCCM (integrated community case management) by the National Malaria Program under the Global Fund to fight AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria subvention. However, these CHWs were mostly managing uncomplicated malaria, diarrhea and ARI, and conducting health education on HIV, family planning, nutrition and immunization.

Training of CHWs

In addition to their iCCM training packages as CHWs, the CHWs were also trained on CBS. Their training was developed from the WHO Community-Based Surveillance Training Manual and they were trained for 4 days. This training included case definitions for malaria, acute diarrhea, bloody diarrhea, cholera, respiratory tract infection, moderate acute malnutrition, severe acute malnutrition, yellow fever, neonatal tetanus, chickenpox, chronic ulcer, measles, poliomyelitis, and meningitis. In addition, they were trained on humanitarian principles, security, the prevention of sexual exploitation and abuse, and accountability for affected populations.

CHWs were trained to use a mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) measurement to identify SAM and MAM cases. There was no local treatment centre or height or length boards available.

Data collection

Surveillance was done by CHWs who collected data primarily through door to door visits in the first 6 to 8 weeks. However, with time it became a combination of home visits and direct reporting of cases by community members to the CHWs. Diseases under surveillance were selected by the project team based on most common epidemic prone diseases locally, and are presented along with the case definitions on Table 1.

Weekly reporting tools were designed to capture the surveillance data for diseases that didn’t require to be reported immediately, such as malaria, diarrhoea and ARI. Each CHW submitted their weekly report at the field office in Ekondo-titi to the MHT. It became apparent that, some CHWs could not travel from their communities to the field office every week because of extremely poor roads, expensive use of boats and insecurity of the roads due to frequent gun battles between the military and non-state armed groups (NSAG). This was the case of communities like Bekumu, Bafaka, Kumbe Balua, Ekue Balue, Illor Balundo and Bongogo 2. CHWs were also trained on how to submit their weekly reports using their personal phones through text messages, which were sent to the MHT. No standardised format for reporting using mobile phones was developed. Data received from CHWs were logged into and analysed using Microsoft Excel on a weekly and monthly base by the MHT.

Supervision of CHWs

CHWs were supervised by the MHT, who were also responsible for field verifications, collection of samples and led the public health interventions related to the reported disease outbreaks or other public health events in collaboration with the DHS and the Regional Delegation of Public Health. The MHT carried out monthly field supervision visits to assess field work, build capacity and review cases.

Ethical consideration

This evaluation was part of a non-research public health response project, framed as a public health evaluation to improve practices and thus was not reviewed by an ethics review board. More so, the interventions under this project were done under normal public health practices and all data as collected as part of routine data collection and was anonymized for the evaluation.

Results

From January 2016 to June 2019 the DHS surveillance system generated no alert for an OPD. In total, 8 alerts of OPD were generated by the RRM+ CBS system as compared to 0 by the DHS during the evaluation period which was from July 2019 to April 2020 (Table. Of these 8 alerts, 7 were investigated by the MHT, and 5 responses occurred to 3 confirmed outbreaks (Table. The table shows the OPD alerts generated and also the endemic diseases monitored by the CBS system. The CBS helped identify and manage 6482 cases of uncomplicated malaria, 2310 ARI, 1882 cases of acute diarrhea, 13,177 screenings of children aged 6–59 months were conducted, identifying 43 cases of SAM. Table 2 Number of reports, alerts generated, and outbreaks recorded

The CBS reported suspected cases for 9 diseases and the CBS system had an alert generation time that ranged from a minimum of 2 days to a maximum of 18 days. The average delay from the day of the first symptom to alert generation by the CBS system was 7.3 days. This broad average reporting time can be explained by some outliers. The case definition for chronic ulcers required that it last more than two weeks to generate an alert leading to a 16 lag-time from first symptoms. Also, patient zero for the measles alert lived in a community not covered by the project and was only seen upon visiting Loe were the disease spread, his time lag was 18 days from first symptoms. Such large variations greatly influenced the average reporting time. Response to investigate OPD alerts by the MHT ranged from 1 days to a maximum of 2 days from the day of alert generation by the CBS system. Suspected outbreak prone diseases reported by CHWs under the RRM+ CBS system in Ekondo-titi, time to reporting and time to investigation

Feedback to communities was done through CHWs in cases where there was no field response after the investigation and by the MHT during field response for confirmed outbreaks.

The MHT collaboration with the DHS

Local health administrators were unused to working with humanitarian actors and initial relationships were challenging, especially with regards to outbreak reporting. As the districts reporting had been mostly silent, the sudden influx of diseases identified when humanitarian actors began working was viewed negatively. This required regular and extensive engagement, updating the local district authorities on all suspected cases as we received them and involved them in the response by updating them regularly of our activities. show that alerts generated by the CBS system were shared with the district within 24 h of the alert generation. This was true for all cases with the exception of the suspected measles outbreak alert case from Illor which after initial phone conversation with the CHW, the MHT suspected a case of chicken pox based on the phone description of the CHW. It was only after the laboratory confirmed the test results as being positive for monkeypox that the MHT alerted the DHS 3 days later. This explains the delay seen for that single case. The average time lag from alert generation to information of the DHS was 0.3 days which was essentially within 24 h.Table 4 Role of RRM+ CBS and DHS in OPD and endemic diseases identified in Ekondo Titi health district, investigation and response

There was an extensive collaboration with the DHS. While the CBS system-generated all the alerts, the district was informed within 24 h in all cases and the response was collaborative between the MHT and the DHS. MHT conducted all field investigations with supplies provided by the DHS. Samples brought from the field were transported to the reference labs by the DHS and results from the lab were brought back to the MHT by the DHS. While the MHT designed and executed all field responses, some supplies required for effective and quality response like vaccines, vaccines carriers, and syringes were provided by the DHS.show that for all OPD alerts the MHT conducted a field investigation mission, collected samples, and carried out a community response for all confirmed and all suspected outbreaks. This additional use of the system is because this CBS wasn’t designed to just identify the cases for the purpose of pure surveillance. This CBS was to allow early identification, reporting, investigation, and response. Given that health centers in the districts weren’t functional and the DHS doesn’t normally have any allocated resources for an investigation and response, the MHT had to play the critical role of being ready to move as soon as they received an alert, investigate the alert, collect samples which were then handed to the DHS to be sent to the reference laboratory. When results were available, the MHT in collaboration with the DHS planned an appropriate response.

Results of interventions undertaken to contain suspected/confirmed outbreaks

Measles outbreak

The MHT upon reception of the alert informed the DHS on the same day. All other CHWs were alerted to be more vigilant in their search for suspected measles cases. The MHT visited Loe the subsequent day for investigation and sample collection in collaboration with the DHS. The DHS provided the cold box and icepacks for protection of the samples. The children were examined and samples were collected by the MHT who also prepared the CHWs and community of the likelihood of an emergency measles vaccination campaign should the samples comeback positive for measles. The MHT also carried out a brief community sensitisation on measles. Samples were sent to reference lab in collaboration with the DHS. After 3 days the MHT were informed by the DHS that 4 of the 5 samples were positive for measles, meeting the national criteria for a measles outbreak. The MHT mobilised CHWs in communities within the affected health areas and other neighbouring communities informing them on the outbreak and the need for an emergency ring vaccination campaign. With vaccines provided by the DHS, the MHT conducted a ‘ring vaccination’ intervention for children in Loe and surrounding communities prior to the laboratory confirmation of the measles cases. A total of 317 children aged 6 months to 14 years were vaccinated during this ring vaccination intervention against measle, mumps and rubella, and administered with vitamin A. No further cases of measles were identified after this ring vaccination.

After the measles outbreak was confirmed, a vaccination campaign for the entire district was only organised 4 months later.

Monkeypox outbreak

A CHW raised an alert for a suspected case of measles to the MHT. The MHT on discussion diagnosed a likely severe case of chicken pox and the CHW was asked to refer the case to the Ekondo-titi district hospital. The patient, a 14-year old boy presented after 2 days and was managed by the hospital. One day after arrival at the hospital, the MHT went in to see the patient and after reviewing the patient’s history and physically examining the characteristic lesions, the MHT made a tentative diagnosis of a suspected monkeypox case. The MHT immediately alerted the hospital administration of their findings. With assistance from the MHT, the patient was immediately placed in isolation with limited contact from both family and hospital staffs. A disinfection unit was set outside the isolation room for those who had contact with the patient to disinfect their hands as they leave the patients room. The MHT then informed the DHS, collected blood samples and swabs from the lesion for analysis. Samples were handed over to the DHS for transportation to the reference laboratory at central level. The MHT then conducted contact tracing of all individuals who had contact with the patient. A total of 32 people were identified including hospital staffs, a member of the MHT, 2 CHWs, family members and neighbours, who were asked to inform the MHT or report to the district hospital if they developed any rashes within 21 days. 4 days later the DHS reported the virology results had confirmed the case to be a monkeypox case. The patient was managed in isolation for another 2 weeks until all lesions had healed completely. Those on the contact list were called weekly for 3 weeks to follow up if anyone had developed symptoms of monkeypox and no other cases were identified in 21 days.

Buruli ulcer/ tropical ulcer outbreak

An outbreak of 21 new cases of chronic leg ulcers amongst children 5–15 years were reported by a CHW from Funge. The MHT immediately informed the DHS, who provided the MHT with swab sticks, a cold box and ice. On arrival the MHT examined all 21 patients and collected the samples. Based on the history and characteristics of the ulcers, the mobile team diagnosed tropical ulcers for all 21 cases. The samples were handed over to the district lab where only 2 were positive for Buruli ulcer. The Buruli ulcer cases were referred to the treatment center at the district hospital. The tropical ulcer cases, whose diagnoses had been made base on the classical presentation and exclusion of Buruli ulcer, were managed at community level by a community nurse who was trained by the MHT on regular and proper wound cleaning, in combination with single dose Azithromycin for all 19 children. Community education and sensitization on Buruli and tropical ulcers were intensified with focus on the causes, means of transmission and prevention.

Suspected cholera outbreaks

For the 2 suspected cholera outbreaks, the DHS in collaboration with the MHT responded promptly to investigate the reports of at least 2 deaths suspected to be cholera related before arrival. The MHT carried out community assessment in relation to the suspected outbreaks. Patients were taken to the nearest health facilities which though under equipped served as treatment centers, where rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for cholera were carried out and results were negative. No Cary Blair transport medium was available. Community education was carried out and the people were provided sufficient water purification tablets to last each household for at least a month.

Suspected meningitis outbreak

As for the suspected meningitis outbreak, the MHT investigated and successfully collected a CSF sample from one patient. A gram stain was done which revealed the presence of gram-positive cocci and gram-positive diplococci. Though the sample was positive for meningitis it wasn’t the epidemic type of meningitis. Patients were referred to the Ekondo-titi district hospital and managed appropriately.

Displacements and security incidents

Throughout the RRM+ project, all communities covered by the project kept shifting states from being internally displaced persons (IDPs) living in bushes or in other host communities, to returnees and letter becoming host communities themselves. Security alerts and population displacements were captured through the CHWs weekly and monthly reports and the MHT’s communication on security events in their immediate and neighboring communities. A total of 15 security events and 16 reported incidents of sudden population displacements were recorded amongst 10 communities. All reported security events where either gun battle encounters between the military and the NSAG, forceful retention, and/or violent harassments. Adding to the visibility materials like badges and project jackets which were provided for all CHWs, they had been trained on security and how to best communicate and or react during a security incident. However, few incidents of harassments were recorded from both military and the NSAGs. One CHW had their house broken into and some of the drugs stolen. Insecurity, poor telecommunication signals, and extremely bad roads where the most common challenges reported by CHWs and the MHT. The safety of CHWs in this project was treated we utmost importance due to frequent security incidences in Ekondo-titi. First, all CHWs were trained on safety and security and humanitarian principles to enable them have foresight on what to do when faced with a security threat. Access negotiations and mediations were done with both the government and community leaders on behalf of both the CHWs and mobile health team. CHWs were told to always have their visibility jackets on for easy identification during targeted incidences.

Discussion

Results from the evaluation of the CBS system proved useful to both the humanitarian response and strengthening the district surveillance and health event response. Given that no case for an OPD was reported and therefore no alert generated by the DHS over a three-year period from when the crisis began in 2016 to the time the CBS system was created in June 2019, and that the CBS system generated 9 alerts as compared to no alert reported by DHS during the period under evaluation. All but one of the 9 generated alerts were investigated and all investigated alerts were responded to by the MHT. CBS filled a gap in surveillance for early detection of suspected outbreaks in remote and insecure areas, given that the DHS surveillance did not detect any alerts in the prior period. Our results corroborate with findings from Kisanga et al whose evaluation of the CBS system in South Sudan, proved to be effective in increasing the number of reported events in conflict settings.

The average OPD alert generation time of 7.3 days together with the response time of 2 days or less from alert generation points to the usefulness of the CBS system in both generating an alert and leading to a timely response. This time lag between the alert generation and response time, falls in line with the timeliness observed in the detection, notification and action of alerts between CBS volunteers and supervisors in a study by Byrne and Nichol

The CBS system generated an alert for a suspected case of measles which led to the confirmation of the first-ever monkeypox case in the region, with one case previously identified in the Northwest region. This was formally addressed by the Minister of Public Health who called for vigilance from all other health districts in the region. As an OPD, it was added to the list of diseases reportable by the CBS, and telephone training was done on how to identify this disease. This was only possible due to the clear physical signs that this disease presents with. Surveillance was carried out for 21 days, and no further cases were identified.

The collaboration with the district through timely relay of alerts generated by the CBS system allowed the DHS to inform the Regional Delegation of Public Health which alerts the national surveillance system thus leading to an overall increase in the national health surveillance strengthening. The alerts generated by the CBS system led to targeted responses by the MHT which was able to carry out rapid response interventions geared toward reducing suffering, saving lives and containing outbreaks.

The use of CHWs living as part of the displaced communities increased community acceptance and engagement of the communities in mass immunization services, even at short notice. Most of the outbreaks occurred in extremely hard-to-reach communities where there was little to no government access, including new IDP settlements in bushes. In the absence of an effective CBS system and a ready intervention team, these outbreaks would likely have resulted in higher morbidity and mortality, following the delay witnessed in organizing a mass measles campaign for the entire district after a confirmed measles outbreak. We believe that the ring vaccination conducted immediately after the measles samples were collected, which helped in containing the spread of the measles outbreak. This is because after the ring vaccination intervention, no other case of suspected measles was reported, even though a mass measles vaccination only occurred 4 months later. It should be mentioned that the reason behind the delay in having a mass measles campaign in the district was due to delay in receiving vaccines from the central level as the Ministry of Health was planning a national measles campaign and the DHS had to wait for the national campaign dates to be programmed.

Communities responded well to feedback on reported outbreaks and this encouraged future reporting, as seen in the review by Guerra. A perceived lack of response could be interpreted as neglect, and lead to reduced future reporting.

Crisis areas are prone to food insecurities which could easily lead to malnutrition, especially amongst under-five children. The active screening of children 6 months to 59 months by CHWs and reporting SAM cases through the CBS system led to the early identification and eventual management of 43 children with SAM. CBS of malnutrition prevalence has been used successfully implemented previously, however, the use of CHWs trained in treatment of uncomplicated SAM worked well in this setting, even though additional training was required at the start of the project and regular supervision and follow-up by the MHT.

Displacement monitoring was carried out as part of the CBS. This was of particular importance in this setting as data about current population figures was lacking and repeated and pendular displacement was common. It is interesting to note the CHWs commonly displaced with the communities so were able to continue surveillance during these pendular displacements. The information on new villages gathered was highlighted to the International Organization of Migration, however, pendular or short-term displacement were commonly not.

Relations between humanitarian actors and the DHS were initially challenging, especially with regards to outbreak reporting. As the traditional reporting system had been predominantly silent in certain health areas, the sudden influx of diseases identified when humanitarian actors began working was viewed negatively. Integration into the existing reporting structure was key for improving these relationships and avoiding duplication. The improved relationship led to over 300 doses of measles and rubella vaccines being provided by the DHS for use by the MHT. This supports Kuehne et al’s findings that integration is key for rapid verification and response.

The extensive acceptance gained through the active participation and collaboration with communities through the service delivery offered as part of the RRM+ model, allowed for community acceptance of the CBS system, and led to safer assess for humanitarian organizations to work, including those coming after the end of the project. Without the other aspects of the project, such as WASH, child protection, health and nutrition, the CBS system would not have been so readily accepted.

After the project ended in April 2020, the MHT informed the district health service of their departure. The district continued working with the CHWs as prior to the start of CBS. However, this time the CHWs had experience from the CBS project which the district will tap from. Further, based on our shared experience, the Ministry of Health in its strategy plan for the conflict affected regions, included scaling up CBS in all districts.

Conclusion

Implementing community led surveillance of OPDs can help in identifying outbreaks, as has been shown by the confirmation of 3 outbreaks (measles, monkeypox and tropical ulcer), compared to 0 reported by the traditional surveillance system in place in the district in the same time, and 0 in the 3 preceding years. This is especially true in hard-to-reach areas where the tradition system has broken down. The MHT was essential to the success of the CBS, with the ability to constantly respond rapidly to 8 of the 9 alerts generated within an average of 2 days in each case, identifying 3 confirmed outbreaks. It also worked well to identify other diseases or events, such as malnutrition and displacement and successfully identified an outbreak which was previously not included in the CHWs training. Collaboration between the MHT and the DHS worked well, and is possible even in conflict situations. CBS can be successfully added to basic PHC services carried out by CHWs and standardized mobile phone reporting could facilitate alert notification time in areas. Humanitarian actors should explore the use of CBS in humanitarian responses to improve disease surveillance and contribute in strengthening health systems. More research on the cost effectiveness of CBS is also needed in conflict settings and other hard-to-reach humanitarian areas.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used during the current project are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AFP:

Acute flaccid paralysisARI:

Acute respiratory infectionCBS:

Community based surveillanceCHW:

Community health workersCSF:

Cerebrospinal fluidDHS:

District Health ServiceIDP:

Internally displaced personIOM:

International Organization for MigrationMHT:

Mobile health teamMUAC:

Mid-upper arm circumferenceNSAG:

Non-state armed groupNWSW:

Northwest SouthwestOCHA:

Organization for the Coordination of Humanitarian AffairsOPD:

Outbreak prone diseaseRDT:

Rapid diagnostic testsRRM + :

Rapid Response MechanismSAM:

Severe acute malnutritionWHO:

World Health Organisation

References

  1. 1.Technical Contributors To The June Who Meeting. A definition for community-based surveillance and a way forward: results of the WHO global technical meeting, France, 26 to 28 June 2018. Euro Surveill. 2019;24(2):1800681. https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.2.1800681.
  2. 2.Polonsky J, Luquero F, Francois W, Rousseau C, Caleo G. Public Health Surveillance After the 2010 Haiti Earthquake: the Experience of Médecins Sans Frontières. PLOS Curr Disasters. 2013;(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.dis.6aec18e84816c055b8c2a06456811c7a.
  3. 3.Ratnayake R, Tammaro M, Tiffany A, Kongelf A, Polonsky J, McClelland A. People-Centered Surveillance: A Systematic Review of the Implementation of Community-Based Surveillance Among Crisis-Affected Populations. Lancet. 2020. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3577836.
  4. 4.Rubenstein BL, Spencer C, Mansourian H, Noble E. Community-based surveillance to monitor trends in unaccompanied and separated children in eastern DRC. Child Abuse Negl. 2015;50:76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.09.002.Article PubMed Google Scholar 
  5. 5.Ndiaye S, Quick L, Sanda O, Niandou S. The value of community participation in disease surveillance: a case study from Niger. Health promotion International; 2003. p. 89–98.Google Scholar 
  6. 6.Lado M, Mackoy S, Steve B, Rumunu J. Evaluation of community-based surveillance for Guinea worm, South Sudan, 2006. South Sudan Med J. 2016;5(3):72–4.Google Scholar 
  7. 7.Biswas G, SDAAJMM. Dracunculiasis (guinea worm disease): eradication without a drug or a vaccine. Philosphical transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0146 PMID: 23798694; PMCID: PMC3720044.
  8. 8.WHO. INTEGRATED DISEASE SURVEILLANCE AND RESPONSE IN THE AFRICAN REGION A GUIDE FOR ESTABLISHING COMMUNITY-BASED SURVEILLANCE. Brazzaville:; 2014.Google Scholar 
  9. 9.Purdin S, Spiegel P, Mack KP, Millen J. Surveillance beyond camp settings in humanitarian emergencies: findings from the Humanitarian Health Information Management Working Group. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2009;24 Suppl 2:s202–5. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049023x00021592.
  10. 10.OCHA. CAMEROON: North-West and South-West Situation Report No. 13 & 14. Geneva:; 2019.Google Scholar 
  11. 11.IOM. Multi-Sector Needs Assessment. Geneva:; 2019 (available on request).Google Scholar 
  12. 12.Kisanga A, Abiuda B, Walyaula P, Losey L, Samson O, Kisanga A, Abiuda B, Walyaula P, Losey L, Samson O. Evaluation of the functionality and effectiveness of the CORE Group polio Project’s community-based acute flaccid paralysis surveillance system in South Sudan. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019:p91–9.
  13. 13.Byrne A, Nichol B, Byrne A, Nichol B. A community-centered approach to global health security: implementation experience of community-based surveillance (CBS) for epidemic preparedness. Global Security: Health, Science and Policy. 2020:71–84.
  14. 14.WHO. Emergency preparedness response. [Online].; 2018 [cited 2020 October. Available from: https://www.who.int/csr/don/05-june-2018-monkeypox-cameroon/en/.
  15. 15.UNICEF. Cameroon Humanitarian Situation Report No. 12 – Reporting Period: December 2019 and overall 2019 program response. Geneva:; 2020.Google Scholar 
  16. 16.Guerra J, Acharya P, Barnadas C. Community-based surveillance: A scoping review. PLOS One. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215278.
  17. 17.Carroll GJ, Lama SD, Martinez-Brockman JL, Perez-Escalmilla R. Evaluation of Nutrition Interventions in Children in Conflict Zones: A Narrative Review. Adv Nutr. 2017:770–9.
  18. 18.Kuehne A, Keating P, Polonsky J, Haskew C, Schenkel K, Le Polain de Waroux O, et al. Event-based surveillance at health facility and community level in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMJ Global Health. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001878.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank UNICEF for funding the project. We are also grateful for the contributions made by our colleagues; Evon Agbor; Marc Serna; Emmanuel Chia; Mosenge Hans Efesoa; Endoh Theodore Ajong, Mr. Ekolle Anicetus and Mr. Ene Etienne in ensuring the success of this project. We also thank all the community health workers and child protection volunteers for their dedication and commitment in the project to serve their communities.

The authors are indebted to all the beneficiary communities for their acceptance of the project teams and the project activities.

Disclaimer

The findings and conclusions in this paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position of the funding agency.

Funding

This project was funded by UNICEF. No funding was received for this publication.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Reach Out N.G.OAlain Metuge, Lundi-Anne Omam, Elizabeth Jarman & Esther Omam Njomo
  2. Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UKLundi-Anne Omam

Contributions

MA, LAO and EJ conceived the methodology for evaluating the CBS and drafted the manuscript; making equal and significal contributions to the manuscript. OE read and made pertinent corrects to the manuscript. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

All authors of this paper were part of the project implementation team and are passionate about improving access to PHC for marginalized communities for improved health outcomes. All authors worked with Reach Out N.G.O that implements humanitarian responses in the South West and North West Regions of Cameroon.

Corresponding author

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

We received approval from the Regional Delegation of Public Health for the South West Region to implement this project. Administrative authorization was provided by the District Medical Officer of Ekondo-titi Health District and the Divisional Officer of Ekondo-titi subdivision. This evaluation was part of a non-research public health response project, framed as a public health evaluation to improve practices and thus was not reviewed by an ethics review board. More so, the interventions under this project were done under normal public health practices and all data as collected as part of routine data collection.

Consent for publication

All authors consented to the publication of this paper and have read the final version.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license,.

DONATION

SOME FIVE REASONS TO GIVE TO CHARITY

Tellus mauris a diam maecenas sed enim ut sem. Viverra accumsan in nisl nisi scelerisque eu ultrices vitae. Pellentesque eu tincidunt tortor aliquam.

FOOD AND WATER

How your donation will impact the Lives of orphans

Diam maecenas sed enim ut sem. Aliquet enim tortor at auctor urna. Quam pellentesque nec nam aliquam sem et tortor consequat. Facilisi morbi tempus iaculis urna id volutpat lacus laoreet non.

CHARITYDONATIONFOOD AND WATERKIDS IN AFRICA

Will Technology Feed a Warming World?

Tellus mauris a diam maecenas sed enim ut sem. Viverra accumsan in nisl nisi scelerisque eu ultrices vitae. Pellentesque eu tincidunt tortor aliquam.

CHARITY

Ending Child Marriage and Building Futures

Nisl rhoncus mattis rhoncus urna. Ullamcorper malesuada proin libero nunc consequat interdum varius sit amet. Pharetra magna ac placerat vestibulum lectus mauris.

×

Hello!

Click one of our representatives below to chat on WhatsApp or send us an email to info@slaefoundation.org

× WhatsApp Us Now